Menu principale:
F.P. B.N. 2001
Luca Beatrice
The art world is divided into a multitude of communities and families; where they congregated, when / started out as a critic, were not so much the cafés as workplaces, galleries and art journal editorial offices. These little hideouts were a natural breeding ground for casual love affairs. Living in the heart of St Germain-des-Près, he district which still contains the greatest number of modern art galleries, I just needed to walk a few steps from an exhibition to enjoy a promiscuous break.
Catherine Millet
La Vie Sexuelle de Catherine M., 2001
The diary-novel, confession, autobiography or simply narrative text by Catherine Millet, the art critic and editor of the Paris-based journal Art Press, brilliantly takes the lid off the vices and virtues of the prominent figures in her microcosm - and it does so through the magnifying glass of her sex life. A fundamental part of our passion for art is naturally to be found in vision: artists, critics and collectors are all voyeurs whose eye is trained by skill and knowledge, as well as by fairly shrewd attitudes obtained through the study of Bataille and Klossowski, who nurture an obsession for capturing hidden details, concealed images, forbidden urges. Admiring art in museums or galleries is thus not all that different from going to a peepshow, visiting pornographic websites or getting aroused in front of a keyhole. Art has always exhibited nudity and proffered images stolen from sex: it is a stimulation of the senses and a cultural justification for voyeurism. What appears significant in Millet's book is a complete absence of eroticism, in favour of pornography pure and simple. While eroticism is permissible and adopted as a model of behaviour, pornography is criminalized as a vice, aimed at an uncultured public of perverts - certainly not the blasé circles of art. Eroticism plays by twisting in on itself, while pornography admits no delay: just like in horror films, pornography uses the plot as no more than a break - a rest - between one murder and another, one screw and the next. A further stimulus and modern aspect of this essay-novel is the total absence of moralising, whether positive or negative, concerning sex. Millet's first-person narrator is a machine at work, one who has no intention of settling scores on behalf of her gender or of society, one who makes no distinction between right behaviour and wrong, but simply describes what she does as though observing herself from afar. I don't know if one could justify reading this book from the point of view of female sexuality, since I really do not know what this means. I think, on the other hand, that it would be the ideal subject for a film by the italian director Tinto Brass, a great narrator in images of the body beautiful and of the joie de vivre of sex beyond all ethics.
THE FIGURE IS ALIVE, IT IS FLESH, TANGIBLE
Peter Greenaway, The Physical Self, 1992
Barbara Nahmad's painting is as dominated by the colour of skin as the book by Millet is dedicated to the triumph of the orgasm. The identity of the characters is not given by the facial features, by the superstructure of clothing or behaviour. What is brought to the fore is especially the naked body, of all ages, a corporeal mass, a state of preservation. Nahmad hunts down images which are accomplices, in other words willing to be seen to prompt a particular type of arousal not linked to the canonical or more fashionable model of beauty, but as a surprising lure for the most banal forms of everyday life. Paid advertisements in trade magazines, as far as one can get from glossy eros and glamorous showgirls who strip off in pin-up calendars, have neutral backgrounds and, more than anything, hide themselves to prevent those who might be able to do so from recognising them. Amateur videos are a endless source of imagery for Barbara: we find ourselves looking at sexes with no name, no occupation. They are no more than what they shamelessly show. The painting focuses on quite anti-erotic details: sagging breasts, pads of fat, shapes which have lost their youth, in order to give these anonymous bodies the solemn tone of classicism. Barbara Nahmad's work has nothing to do with the so-called new figurative painting in metropolitan mode, nor with the poetics of the new flesh of a 'performantic' matrix. An appreciation of neutral and insignificant images is filtered by a skilful use of cultural references and citations, which range from the performances of Jannis Kounellis, Motivo Africano (1970) to the erotic drawings of Pierre Klossowski. At least two of the new paintings shown here recall the photographs in nudist camps taken by Diane Arbus (1963). A not-so-young couple subject their bodies to Arbus's lens in a natural and confidentiall manner, as though she were no more than a friend come to visit them.